In 2022, BTS made headlines worldwide by announcing that all members would fulfill their mandatory military service. As one of Korea’s most prominent global icons, the news of their enlistment sparked debates and interest not only in Korea but also among international fans.

• While some argued that BTS deserved an exemption for their immense contributions to Korea’s cultural influence, the members decided to serve without seeking special treatment.

• Currently, the eldest member Jin and J-Hope have completed their military service and have been discharged, while the other members are also enlisting in sequence and diligently fulfilling their military duties.

Why BTS’s Decision Matters

By choosing to serve, BTS set an example of responsibility and fairness, showing their commitment as Korean citizens. Their decision also served to educate international fans about Korea’s mandatory military service and its significance.

A stark contrast to BTS’s responsible choice is the infamous case of Yoo Seung-jun (Steve Yoo), a top Korean pop star in the late 1990s and early 2000s.

Yoo had promised to fulfill his military duties but suddenly renounced his Korean citizenship to obtain a U.S. passport, effectively avoiding conscription.

• This decision caused widespread outrage in Korea, leading to a lifetime ban on his entry into the country.

• Yoo’s actions are often cited as a cautionary tale, illustrating the severe consequences of avoiding military duty and the public’s strong disapproval of such behavior.

This sparked sensitive discussions about military service across the Korean entertainment industry and society at large.

Public Reactions

• Betrayal: At the time, Yoo Seung-jun had repeatedly stated in various broadcasts and interviews that he would fulfill his military duty faithfully. However, his acquisition of U.S. citizenship and subsequent evasion of military service left many feeling shocked and outraged.
• Fairness in Military Service: Military service is a significant and sensitive obligation for South Korean men. The fact that a famous celebrity evaded it raised serious questions about fairness.
• Social Impact: His case influenced the strengthening of standards regarding military service evasion. It also increased societal pressure on other celebrities and public figures to fulfill their military duties diligently.

In conclusion, the Yoo Seung-jun case has led to profound discussions in South Korean society about the importance and fairness of mandatory military service, as well as the responsibilities of public figures.

Another fascinating story comes from global superstar Psy, who not only served in the military but did it twice!

•Psy initially completed his service in 2003, but it was later discovered that his work during the period didn’t meet the official standards due to mismanagement of duties.

•As a result, he was required to reenlist in 2007, making him one of the few celebrities to serve twice.

Psy’s Dedication

Instead of protesting or evading responsibility, Psy humbly reenlisted and completed his service, earning public respect. His perseverance paid off when he returned to take the world by storm with his megahit “Gangnam Style” in 2012.

The BTS military service debate also raised questions about Korea’s military exemption policy.

•While athletes and traditional artists can sometimes qualify for exemptions through international achievements, K-pop idols rarely fall into this category.

•BTS could have been considered for special treatment given their unprecedented cultural impact, but their choice to serve demonstrates their dedication to fairness and equality.

Their enlistment not only strengthens their connection with Korean fans but also conveys a powerful message about responsibility to their global audience.

For K-pop idols, military service isn’t just an obligation—it’s often a time of personal growth.

•BTS’s Jin, before enlisting, expressed his determination to return stronger and more mature, reassuring fans that this is just a temporary break.

•Completing military service often deepens the trust and admiration fans feel for their favorite stars.

Conclusion: Military Service as a Responsibility and Opportunity

Yoo Seung-jun’s case is a reminder of the potential fallout from avoiding military service, while Psy and BTS show how fulfilling this duty can enhance a star’s public image and legacy. BTS’s decision to serve, in particular, demonstrates their commitment to both their country and their fans, proving that military service can be a meaningful chapter in a K-pop star’s journey.

While the temporary absence of your favorite idols may feel bittersweet, their return promises to be even more exciting and inspiring. So let’s support them with patience and unwavering enthusiasm during their time in service!